Copyright Black Knight MLS, 2021 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
| 2019-04-10 16:46:49 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2018-06-07 13:40:43 -0600 | marked best answer | PACMLS Missing Lookup Values in METADATA According to a client we should be receiving : "One subdivision in question is “Columbia Terrace” in Pasco. Another example is “The Ridge at Hansen Park” in Kennewick." Within the LM_CHAR10_5 fields lookups, these do not appear to be coming through. Could you please refresh the Metadata? URL: http://pacmls-rets.paragonrels.com/re... USER: REWRETS |
| 2018-06-07 12:16:41 -0600 | commented answer | PACMLS Missing Lookup Values in METADATA I am now able to see these subdivisions in the Metadata, thanks. |
| 2018-06-01 12:27:13 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2018-06-01 11:43:36 -0600 | asked a question | PACMLS Missing Lookup Values in METADATA PACMLS Missing Lookup Values in METADATA According to a client we should be receiving : "One subdivision in question is |
| 2018-05-30 11:29:20 -0600 | marked best answer | CMLSSC Missing Field in METADATA The LA1_Char50_1 field is unaccounted for in the metadata in the property class. Could we get a metadata refresh? URL: http://columbiasc.rets.paragonrels.co... USER: REWS |
| 2018-05-30 11:29:07 -0600 | commented answer | CMLSSC Missing Field in METADATA Fixed, thanks. |
| 2018-05-30 10:38:38 -0600 | asked a question | CMLSSC Missing Field in METADATA CMLSSC Missing Field in METADATA The LA1_Char50_1 field is unaccounted for in the metadata in the property class. Could |
| 2018-05-15 13:04:05 -0600 | marked best answer | SCMLS Missing Field in METADATA The L_ListingsOffMarketStatusDate field is unaccounted for in the metadata for at least the RE_1 property class. Could we get a metadata refresh from Sullivan County Multiple Listing Service? URL: http://scmls.rets.paragonrels.com/ret... User: bollerowen |
| 2018-05-15 13:04:05 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
| 2018-05-15 13:03:22 -0600 | commented answer | SCMLS Missing Field in METADATA It's working now, thanks. |
| 2018-05-15 10:35:05 -0600 | asked a question | SCMLS Missing Field in METADATA SCMLS Missing Field in METADATA The L_ListingsOffMarketStatusDate field is unaccounted for in the metadata for at least |
| 2018-05-15 10:31:29 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2018-05-15 10:31:29 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2018-01-15 14:19:13 -0600 | marked best answer | SFAR Missing Field in METADATA The LFD_GreenCertsDocRequired_127 field is unaccounted for in the metadata for at least the RE_1 property class. Could we get a metadata refresh from Santa Fe Association of Realtors? URL: http://sfar.rets.paragonrels.com/rets... User: 7403 2018-01-15 Update: Metadata is now correct |
| 2018-01-15 12:23:40 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2018-01-15 12:23:40 -0600 | edited question | SFAR Missing Field in METADATA SFAR Missing Field in METADATA The LFD_GreenCertsDocRequired_127 field is unaccounted for in the metadata for at least t |
| 2018-01-12 11:16:30 -0600 | asked a question | SFAR Missing Field in METADATA SFAR Missing Field in METADATA The LFD_GreenCertsDocRequired_127 field is unaccounted for in the metadata for at least t |
| 2017-08-23 10:31:38 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2017-08-23 10:31:38 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2017-08-15 12:43:35 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2017-08-14 12:12:24 -0600 | asked a question | Field in returned Query not in METADATA Field in returned Query not in METADATA Hi Guys, We are missing the metadata for a field (AO_IdxInclude) that was recen |
Copyright Black Knight MLS, 2021 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.